The programme will have live public discussions via email or telephone Essay Example

The programme will have live public discussions via email or telephone Essay The programme I viewed was the Heaven And Earth Show. This programme was on at 10.00am on a Sunday morning. The programme consisted of different issues. Firstly, they started off with a brief introduction of what the programme was about. They then started on the topic Is Forgiveness Enough? There were many different people that week that had asked for forgiveness. They were David Seamen asking for forgiveness over his blunder in the world cup,Bill Clinton asking for forgiveness over his affair with Monica Lewinski, the IRA asking for forgiveness for killing innocent civilians and the Pope asking for forgiveness over any pain or problem the church has caused anyone. Secondly they have a section on comparing Humanist weddings and Sikh weddings. They showed the similarities and differences between the two. Thirdly, they had an interview with a b-list celebrity. Her name was Sylvia Sims and was the start of theatre a long time ago. Next they had a section on the healing power of plants a nd how they heal mentally by their view of beautiful scenery. After that there was the discussion on whether forgiveness is enough. Lastly, the programme had short news on the current worldly affairs.I believe the target audience for the Heaven And Earth Show are younger viewers. The layout and format of the show is bright and colourful with young presenters and with the occasional gag. It is not very intense and very religious which relates to young people nowadays. An older viewer would expect more religious activity, not an interview with a b-list celebrity. It has been placed at a later time of 10.00am as on Sundays younger people tend to have a lie in thus the programme is at a later time. It is also on Sunday as this a day off for many people and more viewers would join in.The target audience might enjoy the programme as it is cheerful and not intense as say the Songs of Praise this programme tends to make younger people turn off due to the fact that they find it quite boring. However, the Heaven And Earth Show has a quirky setting and format. It is colourful which always catches the eye of lets say teenager. Also the fact that they have incorporated famous people like David Seamen interests the viewer to see what is being analysed. As the presenters are also young the viewer might feel they can relate to the presenters (male and female) as they are of the same ages roughly. They also say a few jokes during the programme, which also shows that the programme is not serious.Some viewers might not enjoy this programme, as they are simply not religious or interested in this type of programme. They might be a time clash with another programme which several viewers like, which results in the programme not being watched. Also some teenagers might find it boring to watch and may switch off. Older people might not watch it as they might find it too light this is that they find it not serious enough and maybe are not happy with the way they choose to set it out. O ther more religious people might not watch it, as its simply not religious enough.A religious documentary I viewed was about arranged marriages. It was about an Asian boy whom his mum had arranged a bride for him back home in Pakistan. All he had seen was a picture of his wife-to-be and had never met her in his life or even spoken to her. It shows the feeling and emotion the groom goes through in this time.I believe young Asian people would prefer to watch a programme of this sort as they might have an arranged marriage and want to understand the prospects they go through. Other races may also watch it as they might want to gain a greater understanding of what an arrange marriage involves.Some people may not find this programme interesting as they know it will not affect them and dont really care. Others may find it boring or they would prefer to watch something different.In my opinion, I found the programme of interest as it gave me an insight of arranged marriages. Although I am n ot going to have an arranged marriage, in the future I might come across someone who has and will understand how and why they had an arranged marriage.A worship programme I have viewed is Songs of Praise. This programme is on Sundays on BBC one between 17:30pm and 18:05pm so it is on for 35 minutes. The main focus of the programme is to sing hymns, which is a Christian act of worship. These programmes are targeted at Religious Christians and they are set in mainly churches. Often, famous people are interviewed on Songs of praise and sometimes local people are also interviewed. The programme is enjoyed by many as many traditional songs are sung. The programme I watched was presented by the famous singer Sir Cliff Richard and was about many of his personal favourite hymns. He explained his belief in Christianity and also sang some hymns too. Their was also an interview with the famous producer Pete Waterman and he expressed his love for choral music. Their was also an exclusive perfor mance from his new protà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½gà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ 14-year-old Lauren Waterworth.The religious/moral issue I will be analysing will be murder between Janine Butcher, Paul and Barry Evans in Eastenders. This storyline was an ongoing saga in which Janine intended to marry Barry for his money when she was in love with Paul and they were having an affair all throughout the build up. They both found out that Barry had a heart condition and could die anytime soon. So Janine decided to marry Barry for his money as he would die anyway and she could be with Paul. They did eventually get married but after the wedding ceremony as Barry called the doctor he found out that he didnt have a heart condition and he would live many more years. This shocking news spoilt all the plans and Janine couldnt be with Barry anymore. As they were taking a walk on the Scottish highlands, Janine confessed all to Barry. But he was so shacked he was in denial and forgave her straight away and wanted her back. Janine ; however had other plans and pushed Barry over a cliff to his death.Janine was facing this problem of being stuck with someone she didnt love because she married Barry only for his money and was really in love with Paul. I would say it was more a moral issue than a religious one as none of the characters are religious at all and are not practising Christians. The only solution was to confess all and this was done but only after the marriage, however after confessing Barry was in so much denial and shock he decided to take her back and forgive her on the spot even for a little happiness. Different ideas and viewpoints were definitely communicated as when Paul realised what he was actually doing he decided to break up with Janine. There was also the viewpoint of Ricky Butcher, Janines sister who was absolutely disgusted with her actions and left Walford with his child as he could not trust Janine near his child. However, Janine was actually pleased by her actions and showed no signs of guilt, in a sick and twisted way. There has been quite a lot of discussion on this issue and they have mainly been negative and all towards Janine Butcher. My opinion on this issue is that it was well perceived and fitted in with Janines character as she has a history of being evil.Janine was portrayed as a sick and twisted lady who had no care or guilt to whom she hurt. But Paul on the other although he did commit adultery deteriorated into guilt and was ashamed of what he did. This made the audience feel pity for him and he was forgiven. However, Janine was still living her life full of deception and was trying to get every ounce of sympathy. But the audience view of her was disgusting. I believe this was the correct way to deal with this type of story line as it very close to reality as there these types of people in the world. The perception of the characters was also right as Janine has a history of hurt and betrayal.The film I will be analysing is East is East a film about George Khan a tough father and proud Pakistani chip shop owner. He is bringing up his family of seven children in a cramped terraced house in Salford, North of England. The year is 1971 and the family are finding life tough. George wants the best for his kids but the idea of arranged marriages and other Pakistani customs does not appeal to his children. Meenah(his daughter) prefers swapping her sari for a football shirt, Tariq is the smooth-talking ladies man at the local nightclub and this is the story of what happens when two cultures collide within one family.The issue I will be focusing on is arranged marriages which is a main focus in this film. Arranged marriages used to be forced upon the couple, whereby they had no choice or any say in the matter. The couple would not have met each other until their wedding day. So if the couple were not attracted to each other, they would have no choice but to keep quiet about it. Obviously they could not have got divorced in the Asian cult ure, as the families reputation would have been affected, although divorce is still an unpopular subject within the Asian community and this is the topic dealt with in this film. The film begins with the arranged marriage of George Khans oldest son, who is silently angry and displeased with the arranged marriage but doesnt voice his anger. His father forces him to have an arranged marriage to an unknown girl. But just as the wedding ceremony begins he walks out as the pressure gets too much. This leads to George kicking his son out and pretending he has no oldest son, and says he is dead. I have chosen the theme of arranged marriages as it is an issue that is dealt with in our everyday lives. The effect it will have on people is to show the hardship children go through when there is a generation gap and also a mix of cultures.But that isnt the end of arranged marriages. Still, after the disaster of the last arranged marriage, the father undercover decides to get his other two sons a rranged in marriage secretly without the sons knowledge. The sons in anger rip up all the traditional marriage clothing and the father decides to beat a son, but beats the wrong son. This also leads to the wife (a white woman) standing up for herself but also getting beaten. The sons are forced to meet the daughters who very ugly. But at the meeting they show very poor manners and start to act up which leads to the daughters father walking out and rejecting the marriage. George then realises he is wrong and the family are happy again.The film gives the impression that all Asian families force their children to have an arranged marriage, which is totally untrue. There is also the fact that a Muslim married a Christian woman. This in Islam is totally forbidden, as a Muslim is only allowed to marry another Muslim. So, this was also depicted totally untrue. If the script writers would have had a converted Christian, it would have been more suitable. Children nowadays, if they saw that t hey might think it would be alright to get married to a Christian when it is not. I think the film writer was trying to show the difficulty of having a mixed-culture and mixed-race marriage as it poses new difficulties and problems. I believe the issue could have been dealt with more sensitively, as the Muslim father was made out to be a villain and the mother a hero sort of figure. This could have also caused offence to many viewers because of the way the issue and characters have been dealt with.Arranged marriages is an issue as it is something that takes place in our everyday lives and people need to have a greater understanding of what goes on as the country is getting more mixed than ever. The significance of having an arranged marriage is it helps maintain the social satisfaction system in the society, it gives parents control over family members and it enhances the chances to preserve and continue the family line.In my opinion, the issue was dealt with very badly, as it was m ade to portray Muslim fathers as wife and son beaters and also they were made a joke out of. All arranged marriages are also nothing likes this, maybe some are but many are with the consent of the son/daughter. But it was quite a funny film. Some people might have taken offence to this film aswell because of the way Muslims were portrayed.Television always presents religious people as out of touch with the modern worldThis statement basically means that television programmes always portray religious people as not up to date with the modern world.There are many examples of religious characters in television and film these days. I have watched a number of films and programmes which have religious characters in them. The films and programmes which I will focus on are East is East and The Heaven and Earth showEast is East had one main religious character who was George Khan. He was presented as being out of touch with the modern world and also portrayed as a person stuck in his traditio nal values. He was presented this way as he was forcing his sons to get married to some unknown girls, as this would never happen if it was a less religious or younger father.Another programme which presents religious people as out of touch with the modern world is Songs of praise. The show itself shows that it is out of touch with the modern world as it only focuses on one religion when in todays world Britain is a multi-faith country. The actual hymns are also based solely on 18th/19th century hymns. They do not include modernised Christian music, such as RnB gospel, and hip hop gospel hence ignoring those people who are not interested in hymns that are not of their time.Eastenders is also another programme which portrays religious people this way. The character Dot Cotton is portrayed as a typical out of touch person, because she allows her religion to influence and justify everything that she does. She re-married and married Jim Branning and because of her religious beliefs, dec ided to buy a bunk bed to sleep separately. This action is totally going against the process of consummating their marriage.However, The Heaven and Earth show perceived the religious characters as in touch with the modern world. This was because they were bright, happy and made quite a lot of jokes. They also played music and wore normal, casual clothes. The use of modern technology e.g. call-ins, emails and texts lets viewers express and join in discussion topics. They also focused on many of the current affairs going on and also examined different aspects of different religions. They also added interviews with aCelebrity which definitely doesnt show they are out of touch with the modern world.Vicar of Dibley is also another programme which doesnt show religious people being out of touch with the modern world. We know this immediately as the programme is based on a female priest, keeping up with the changes being made in the catholic religion. It is also a comedy and sees her as a fun and sociable person who also makes fun of traditional beliefs.There are also many documentaries such as Panorama which deal with many religious issues but unlike religious programmes, influencing you from one side of view, the programme lets you decide. This shows religious people being in touch with the modern world as it examines todays society and identifies changes.A stereotype is a fixed idea, on something or someone. For example a skinny person is the only beautiful type. Films and programmes often use stereotypical characters as this is what the audience want to see or it maybe is appropriate to the storyline. In some films or programmes the Director purposely uses a stereotype as a religious figure being out of touch with the modern world as this can sometimes be quite comic. However, in other films or programmes this is not the case, religious people are seen to be in touch with the modern world. For example, in Sister Act a nun is seen to be very hilarious and gets on very well with a bunch of teenage school children. She is portrayed as being funny and up to date with the modern world.Overall, I believe that the Television does occasionally present religious people as out of touch with the modern world as this can sometimes be very funny and appropriate. I dont personally have a problem with this, unless the characters are perceived wrongly about their religion or the religion is made to look bad or unfair. However, it still offends many people and Directors should be more sensitive when dealing with religious people or issues.

Free Essays on Blow to Psyce

One person has died after anthrax exposure, compared to more than 5,300 who perished in the hijacking attacks on New York and Washington. But whoever is behind the recent anthrax scares - and there is no known connection with the Sept. 11 attacks - is inducing confusion and psychological distress - a good definition of terrorism. In an ABCNEWS poll released Tuesday, 65 percent said they were worried about the anthrax situation, with a third saying they were worried a "great deal." And 54 percent said they were worried that they or a loved one might become infected. In waging psychological warfare, the bioterrorists are manipulating our fears by posing risks of unknown and potentially deadly consequences to a large population of Americans, even if the actual casualties are limited in number, says Stephen Cimbala, a terror expert and Penn State political scientist. "People are led to expect that disaster may strike randomly and regardless of their ability to prevent it or prepare for it," he said. "Creating this expectation of random vulnerability is the necessary condition for widespread hysteria." Also necessary for widespread panic is making the privileged feel as vulnerable as the lower rungs of society, Cimbala said. The pattern of anthrax incidents thus far meets these requirements. At some of the nation's most prominent news organizations, critical in setting the national tone, journalists are on edge with anthrax spores found in their offices and infecting at least four of their colleagues. And the nation's business has been disrupted to the highest levels, with the U.S. House of Representatives closing down for several days. The chairman of the congressional subcommittee that has studied anthrax for years acknowledges that terrorists appear to be winning another battle here, even if the results are not catastrophic. "This anthrax is not such a dramatic advance that we are in real danger yet," Rep. Christopher ... Free Essays on Blow to Psyce Free Essays on Blow to Psyce One person has died after anthrax exposure, compared to more than 5,300 who perished in the hijacking attacks on New York and Washington. But whoever is behind the recent anthrax scares - and there is no known connection with the Sept. 11 attacks - is inducing confusion and psychological distress - a good definition of terrorism. In an ABCNEWS poll released Tuesday, 65 percent said they were worried about the anthrax situation, with a third saying they were worried a "great deal." And 54 percent said they were worried that they or a loved one might become infected. In waging psychological warfare, the bioterrorists are manipulating our fears by posing risks of unknown and potentially deadly consequences to a large population of Americans, even if the actual casualties are limited in number, says Stephen Cimbala, a terror expert and Penn State political scientist. "People are led to expect that disaster may strike randomly and regardless of their ability to prevent it or prepare for it," he said. "Creating this expectation of random vulnerability is the necessary condition for widespread hysteria." Also necessary for widespread panic is making the privileged feel as vulnerable as the lower rungs of society, Cimbala said. The pattern of anthrax incidents thus far meets these requirements. At some of the nation's most prominent news organizations, critical in setting the national tone, journalists are on edge with anthrax spores found in their offices and infecting at least four of their colleagues. And the nation's business has been disrupted to the highest levels, with the U.S. House of Representatives closing down for several days. The chairman of the congressional subcommittee that has studied anthrax for years acknowledges that terrorists appear to be winning another battle here, even if the results are not catastrophic. "This anthrax is not such a dramatic advance that we are in real danger yet," Rep. Christopher ...

Ethnics studies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Ethnics studies - Essay Example r mentions that â€Å"the cover of National Review featured President William Jefferson Clinton, first Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton and vice president Al Gore, all in yellowface† (Hwang). He further explains that this paints the fact that the political leaders have been greatly blinded by Asia’s wealth so that America is now losing its identity as a nation. Such circumstance is also reflected in the character of Terrence Granville who was poisoned by the evil doctor. Consequently, the young man goes to his team and encourages his girlfriend to unearth the real sword and mask to give to Manchu. Like the yellow-faced politicians, Granville, a representation of American leaders, is pushed blindly to bring his team to the dangers of Manchu’s evil plans. World power is one of the great desires of leaders that led to various wars and killed many people. The movie mentioned above also portrays this theme. Dr. Manchu wanted Genghis Khan’s armor and mask because he wanted to dominate the world. However, the English Nayland Smith and Sir Lionel Barton are determined to stop him from his evil plans. Therefore, they need to get to the tomb of the fallen great Mongolian leader before Manchu does. This event reflects the idea of Hwang’s representation of Asians as pollutants (p. 9). As such, they should be minimized if not extinguished. The world domination of Dr. Manchu represents the scattering of Asians who are thriving wherever they go. For instance, during the gold rush, many Chinese migrated to America. However, they are often suppressed by the Whites because they obviously have leadership capabilities. A time finally came when the Chinese had to serve in American homes. This mixing of races in one environment allowed int ermarriages. The lovable characteristics of the Asians attracted them to the Americans nevertheless there has always been that fear of their ethnicity. Again, this could be seen in the lives of Granville and Manchu’s daughter, Fah Lo See. When

Philosophy-Explain why Aristotle is known as the commonsense Essay

Philosophy-Explain why Aristotle is known as the commonsense philosopher - Essay Example The latter group of subjects is of common interest and appeal to a wide audience. This is one reason why he is considered a common-sense philosopher. Also, during 3rd century BC, no advanced methods of logical deductions were devised yet. As a result, Aristotle had to employ simpler methods bordering on common-sense to perform his analyses. For example, with the limited analytic and scientific tools at his disposal, most of Aristotle’s writings tended to be theoretical and qualitative. This meant that they were accessible to the general audience as well. For example, his writings on science were verified or disproved using mathematical models only as late as the 16th century, for there were no proper methods for disproving the same in the interim period. Interestingly, his reputation for being a common-sense philosopher is strengthened by some of the errors of observation/assessment he made. He had famously proclaimed in his History of Animals that human males have more teeth compared to females – something that could be shown to be incorrect upon simple investigation. He perhaps based this view on the fact that males are generally stronger than females. Similarly, he asserted that a heavy object will fall faster than a light object based on common-sense and intuitive observation.

The Federal Reserve Essay Example for Free

The Federal Reserve Essay The Federal Reserve is a federal government department that is independent from political influence, so that they can regulate, and grant insurance to the people of the United States. It also functions as a backer of banks so that people do not lose their money. In addition they regulate the curricula ion of the money flow and set requirements that banks must follow. In the following we will explore the functions of the twelve Federal Reserve banks, and the reason that the Federal Reserve is considered the bankers bank. In addition the role of the Federal open Market committee will be explored in their role in economic policy. Also there will be exploration into why federal would want to decrease the money supply. The twelve Federal Reserve banks have three main functions that they must do, to keep the economy and money flow correct. The first is inspection of local banks within their jurisdiction to ensure they are living up to the regulations set by the Federal Reserve. There second main function is to infuse or take out money from circulation so that the circular flow is maintained at a proper level. In addition they process thousands of checks, and ensure that debit and credit transaction goes through smoothly [ (smale, 2010) ]. These main actions are essential in ensuring the economy and money flow operates correctly without problems. The reserve banks are considered the banker banks because; they store currency and make money available for the member banks. They also process  the checks and debits from the member banks. They are king of banks and regulate the banking industry in the process. They also control the flow of money, so that the value of it stays consistent and does not drop. This is essential in controlling the money flow and economic prosperity of the United States Economy. [ (education.org, 2012) ] The Federal open market committee is a committee that is made up of seven member board of governors, and five Federal Reserve Bank presidents. There role in monetary policy is that they determine what is best in day to day regulations of both the reserve banks and their members. In addition they set certain policies that affect the economy in different ways. They determine the amount of money and credit that will be available in the United States economy. There is to maintain stability and growth in the United States economy. They try to ensure enough reserve of money to encourage expansion of money and credit to the banks in their network. [ (board, 2012) ] The Federal Reserve would consider cutting the money supply to sure up the economy. If there is too much money out there and not enough want to use that money, it is not good for the economy. They control the money supply with rising or falling of interest rates. Higher interest rate result in less borrowing, this tightens up the money supply and allows the economy to even out in the long run. If they want to put more money into the economy they would lower interest rates and as a result more people are willing to borrow more money. They would want to cut the supply when they want and need to borrow money is not high. They would do this is the economy was starting to slow, and would keep the money supply lowered till the need and want for that money is granted again. Before the Federal Reserve was created there was times when people would not use banks, because if the bank failed they would lose all their money they had in the bank. This would result in people being scared to put money in the bank during economic hard times because of their fear of losing there life’s savings. The creation of the Federal Reserve gave people an insurance that there money would not be lost in the case of a bank going under. The  Federal Reserve would promise to pay this back to them if that happened. The Federal Reserve would also make economic decisions in the economy that would keep it more stable than before. The Federal reserve is a responsible for ensuring that the economy and money supply stays stable, and ensures that member banks run up to federal standards. The main functions of the open market committee are to regulate the flow of currency and keep in reserve of money so that it creates a stable United States economy and federal regulation. People were afraid to put money in the banks before the creation of the Federal Reserve banks. This would change after the creation of the federal banking system. At some points the Federal Reserve’s needs to limit the amount of money in the economy to ensure economic supply and demand. Works Cited board, T. f. (2012). The structure of the federal reserve. Retrieved January 15, 2012, from federalreserve.gov: http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/frseries/frseri2.htm education.org, F. (2012). The structure of the federal reserve. Retrieved January 15, 2012, from Federalreserve education.org: http://www.federalreserveeducation.org/about-the-fed/structure-and-functions/ smale, P. (2010, Novemeber 10). Congressional research service. Retrieved January 15, 2012, from www.fas.org: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS20826.pdf

Options for Financing the Purchase of a Website :: Sell Websites Buy Websites

Options for Financing the Purchase of a Website Reprinted with permission of VotanWeb.com Financing a website purchase, or getting cash for a down payment can take many forms. Hopefully the options listed below will give you some ideas where you can find the money to buy a website! Credit Cards - many buyers these days are tapping their credit cards for their down payment to buy a website. The downside of this option is that if you are getting an SBA loan to buy a website, they won’t let you use â€Å"a credit card/loan – borrowed money† for the down payment. Other than that this option works for many since there is no waiting for the money or cumbersome approval process. SBA Loans – Many websites today are purchased with 7(a) SBA loans. There are conditions however in getting one to buy a website. You still have to put down between 15%-30% depending on the lender, you must have good or excellent credit, and the website has to have sufficient cash flow to support the debt service of the loan. The loans are typically 10 years in duration and 2-3 points above the prime interest rate. The process of getting an SBA loan to buy a website can be a tedious one and can take one month to six months to complete/fund. Home Equity – With home equity growing rapidly, many buyers utilize these funds to either buy a website or utilize it for a down payment. Lenders are eager to give out home equity loans. Loans can usually be secured rather rapidly, but plan ahead and move quickly so you don’t miss out on any great websites that come out on the market for sale. Owner Financing – This form of financing is only applicable we=hen you have a willing website owner. Usually the buyer will put down 40 to 60% (utilizing one of the methods above), and the owner will carry back a note for a duration of usually two to five years. Interest rates vary but they usually will be higher than banks or commercial resources. Sometime there will be â€Å"combo† financing with the owner taking back a partial note and the rest of the financing will come from the above resources. Retirement Plans – Many buyers have built up sizeable amounts in their work 401(k) plans. There is a way to tap this money tax free – put it into a â€Å"special trust† that then buys the website for you.

Climate change and Solutions

Climate change is a concept that has generated much controversy in recent times, the many competing theories as to why climate change is occurring is no longer meaningful and we are now at a stage where unless serious measures are introduced to combat the causes of climate change human kind as a civilisation could be wiped out forever. As a UCT student and a South African citizen I firmly believe that climate change has mainly been induced by the developed world, however, despite this fact, the responsibilities of combating global change do not primarily lie in the hands of the developed world. Successfully overcoming such a huge problem such as climate change requires the cooperation and willingness of the entire world. There comes a time where we have to accept responsibility for our actions. That time is now. It is not too late to correct the mistake we have made, however we need less talk and more action. The policies of mitigation and adaption which traditionally have been the main two policies in combating climate change have proved to be limiting in their effectiveness (Parry, 2009:1-2). For example, achieving current mitigation targets will not prevent major environmental impacts, as in order for mitigation to have any effect in reducing global damage global emission cuts of 80 percent are necessary (Parry, 2009:1). According to Martin Parry the fundamental cause of climate change is unsustainable development, both in the past and the present (Parry, 2009:1). Sustainable development is therefore pivotal in forming the fundamental prerequisites for combating climate change. Parry further goes on to emphasize the necessity for the implementation of a sustainable development strategy that ‘combines mitigation and adaptation in a whole package of other development strategies, including high levels of efficiency and equity in resource use, investment, governance and income growth' in order to successfully and effectively confront climate change (Parry, 2009:8). In response to the article published in the Mail and Guardian on the 10th September 2009; combating climate change will not necessarily stagnate or reduce development. Low carbon economies are effective in creating employment opportunities and bringing about the fundamental prerequisites that are essential for enticing development whilst limiting environmental damage (Winkler and Marquard, 2009:62). Energy efficiency programmes are most effective in reducing emissions with little economic consequence which in a country such as South Africa is desperately needed in order to reduce carbon emissions with little effect on economic development (Winkler and Marquard, 2009:62). Other ways of reducing emissions as highlighted by Winkler and Marquard include the implementation of non-carbon and reduced carbon energy supplies in the form of hydroelectricity, natural gas and solar power (Winkler and Marquard, 2009:62). However, changing development paths is a very challenging and time consuming process which can be bought about in various ways including; the imposition of carbon taxes, selective beneficiation and incentive programmes for energy-intensive industries (Winkler and Marquard, 2009:62). Climate change is a global problem that can only be solved through global cooperation and teamwork. The injustices of the past must be forgotten and both the developed and developing world must work together to ensure the immediate and drastic reduction in emissions. Combating global climate change is a long term process that requires extreme dedication and ruthless legislation that will ensure the full cooperation from countries the world over. Economic growth is not the priority anymore; mankind could potentially be on the brink of extinction unless drastic measures to combat climate change are implemented. ‘When the last tree is cut down, the last river poisoned, the last fish caught, then, only man will discover, that he cannot eat money'.